- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010058702022 NC: 2026:KHC:46770 RSA No. 237 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.237 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. MRS TAHIRA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS W/O. K P SHIRAJUDDIN 2. MRS. MAIMUNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O. S ABBAS, 3. MR. ABDUL RAZAK AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS NOS.1 TO 3 ARE CHILDREN OF USMAN NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/O SAMPYA IN ARYAPU VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, DK 4. MR. ABDUL RAHIMAN SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS., 4(a) MR.HAMEED A AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O ABDUL RAHIMAN KALLARPE HOUSE POST: ARYAPU VILLAGE – 574 210 PUTTUR TALUK D.K 4(b) MRS. APSA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010058702022 NC: 2026:KHC:46770 RSA No. 237 of 2022 D/O ABDUL RAHIMAN 4-11, KUNJUR PANJA HOUSE ARYAPU POST AND VILLAGE – 574 210, PUTTUR TALUK, DK 4(c) SMT.MARIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O MOHAMAD KUNHI KALANJA – 574 212 SULLIA TALUK D.K DISTRICT. 4(d) SMT.ASMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS W/O C. ABDUL KAREEM 1-205-4, CHANNAVARA HOUSE POST: PERUVAJE-574 212 SULLIA TALUK D.K.DISTRICT. 4(b) TO 4(d) REP. BY THEIR GPA 4(a) …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MRS. NABISA W/O LATE BABA KUNHI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SRI USMAN S/O LATE S.BAPA KUNHI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 3. SRI MAHAMMAD KAMAL S/O LATE S.BAPU KUNHI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 4. SRI ABDUL AHMMOD S/O LATE S.BAPA KUNHI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010058702022 NC: 2026:KHC:46770 RSA No. 237 of 2022 5. SRI MOHAMMAD MASOOD S/O LATE S.BAPA KUNHI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 6. MRS.MAHAMMAD RISHAD S/O ALTE S.BAPA KUNHI AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 7. MRS.ZEENATH D/O LATE S.BAPA KUNHI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 8. KUMARI SHAMSHIDA D/O LATE S.BAPA KUNHI AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 9. KUMARI RAFEEDA D/O LATE S. BAPA KUNHI AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT ARYAPU CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, SAMPYA, POST:ARYAPU-574 210 PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT. 10. SRI. S IBRAHIM S/O. MAHAMMADH MUKRI, SAMPYA IN ARYAPU VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI. SACHIN B S, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8 AND R9; (VAKALATH NOT FILED FOR R2 AND R5) VIDE ORDER DATED 03.08.2026 R10 IS DELETED] THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010058702022 NC: 2026:KHC:46770 RSA No. 237 of 2022 DATED 07.12.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.127/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.11.2004 PASSED IN O.S.NO.13/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) PUTTUR, D.K. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Parties are present. They present a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. 2. The contents of the compromise petition read over to the parties and they agree that the terms of the compromise petition depict true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of compromise. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010058702022 NC: 2026:KHC:46770 RSA No. 237 of 2022 3. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the compromise petition and dispose of this appeal in terms of the compromise petition. 4. Accordingly, following: ORDER Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. Office is directed to pass modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 97