1 CGHC010311292026 2026:CGHC:42179 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4513 of 2026 Mahesh Ram Jaiswal S/o Radheshyam Jaiswal Aged About 61 Years Occupation - Salesman At Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Phaguram, Registration No. 63, R/o Village Bodasagar, District Sakti Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 2 - Registrar, Cooperative Societies Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies District Sakti Chhattisgarh. 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Bilaspur (C.G.). 6 - Branch Manager, Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Branch Adbhar, District- Sakti (C.G.). 7 - Authorized Officer / President, Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Phaguram, District- Sakti (C.G.). 8 - Chandrakant Darshan, Salesman, Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Phaguram District- Sakti (C.G.). ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Abhuday Singh, holding brief of Mr. Prashant Dansena, Advocate For Res. Nos. 5 & 6 : Ms. Seema Verma, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2026.10.03 12:29:27 +0530 2 For Res./State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Government Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 28/09/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1. That this Hon’ble Court kindly pleased to issue an appropriate direction quashing the resolution/order dated 16.05.2026 through which the charge was arbitrarily handed over to Respondent No. 7. 10.2. Kindly direct the Respondents to formally hand over the charge of Manager to the petitioner as per the transfer order dated 13.05.2026 based on his seniority. 10.3. Kindly direct the Respondent authorities to decide the representation dated 19.05.2026 and the reminder application dated 20.06.2026 within a stipulated time frame. 10.4. Kindly pass any other order or direction as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation before the authorities concerned seeking redressal of his grievance, which is presently pending consideration. He, therefore, prays that a direction may be issued to the concerned authorities to consider and dispose of the said representation expeditiously, preferably within a stipulated period. 3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5 and 6 submit that, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent-authorities to consider and dispose of the pending representation, they have no objection to the said limited prayer. It is submitted that the pending representation of the petitioner 3 may be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, instead of keeping the present petition pending, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage with a direction to the concerned authorities to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, as contained in Annexure P/9, in accordance with law, rules and regulations applicable thereto, and in an objective and reasoned manner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. In the event the said application/representation is required to be considered and decided by any authority subordinate to the concerned authority, the concerned authority shall be at liberty to forward/transmit the same to the competent authority for its consideration and decision in accordance with law. The competent authority, upon receipt thereof, shall consider and decide the same within the aforesaid period in accordance with law. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 8. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ami