GHULAM MOHAMMAD BHAT THROUGH ATTORNEY HOLDER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (RURAL DEVELOPMENT) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2467/2026 · 2026-09-29
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3807 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3807 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.90 Supp. Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2467/2026 CM(6673/2026) GHULAM MOHAMMAD BHAT THROUGH ATTORNEY HOLDER
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s).
Through: Mr. Tawheed Ahmad, Advocate Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (RURAL DEVELOPMENT) AND OTH ...Respondent(s). Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 29.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the present writ petition, which involves serious disputed questions of fact, seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under law.
2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 29.09.2026
“Mubashir ”