Kaushil Higher Seccondary School v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/3840/2026 · 2026-09-29
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38069 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38069 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010272102026
2026:CGHC:42644
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3840 of 2026 1 - Kaushil Higher Seccondary School Through Its Principal Arun Kaushil S/o Shri Nand Ram Kaushil Aged About 55, Years R/o Kaushil Higher Secondary School
Tulsi,
Nagar
Korba,
District
Korba
C.G. 2 - Gaurav Yuva Mandal Tulsi Nagar Korba Through Its Secretary Arun Kaushil S/o Shri Nand Ram Kaushil Aged About 55 Years, Working As Principal Kaushil Higher Secondary School Tulsi Nagar Transport Nagar Korba District Korba C.G.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education Manahandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar District Raipur C.G.
492002. 2 - District Education Officer, Korba District Korba C.G. 3
- Joint
Director
Education
Division
Bilaspur
C.G. 4 - Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education Through Its Secretary, Pension Bada, Raipur District Raipur C.G.
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery) RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV
2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Government Advocate For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/09/2026
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition afresh, as, in the meantime, certain orders have been passed against the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and there being no objection on behalf of the respondents, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition afresh.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi