Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3806 (UTT)

JITENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/562/2026 · 2026-02-24

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1229 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS/ 5 6 2 / 2 0 2 6 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. G.D. Joshi and Mr. Pratul Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pacholia, Advocate for the respondent. 2. According to the petitioner, certain persons who are not eligible for appointment as Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School, are also being considered for appointment. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that writ petition is premature, as no legal injury has been caused to the petitioner as yet. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if all the advertised vacancies are filled up by appointing ineligible persons, then there would be no vacancy left for the petitioner, which would result in denial of right to be considered for appointment to the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to make 2026:UHC:1229 representation to the competent authority. 6. If petitioner makes representation within two weeks, the competent authority shall take decision thereupon, as per law, within six weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 24.02.2026 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923 c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4B ABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2026.02.24 17:07:25 +05'30'