Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3806 (JHR)

HENRY KUJUR v. OLIVE KERKETTA

FA/159/2025 · 2026-01-27

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1896-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No.159 of 2025 ------ Henry Kujur, Aged about-37 years, S/o-Johan Kujur, Permanent Resident of Village-South Duliya (Howrah), P.O.-Sankrali, P.S.- Sankrali Duliya, District-Howrah, West Bengal …. …. Appellant Versus Olive Kerketta, Aged about-35 years, W/o-Henry Kujur, Daughter of- Late Samuel Kerketta, R/o Village-Potka (S.P.G. Mission Compound), P.O. + P.S.-Chakradharpur, District-West Singhbhum, Jharkhand ..... .... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Madhav Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate ------ 05/Dated: 27.01.2026 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the judgment dated 15.10.2024 and decree signed on 24.10.2024 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chaibasa in Original Suit No.100 of 2024. 2. Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent-wife has raised serious objection on the issue of maintainability of the present appeal on the ground that the marriage was dissolved on the basis of joint application filed on behalf of both the parties on 08.10.2024, as has been taken note by the learned Family Court in paragraph-6 thereof. 3. Mr. Madhav Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant-husband, upon this, has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this 2026:JHHC:1896-DB 2 appeal. 4. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and as such, disposed of. 5. In consequence thereof, I.A. No.10569 of 2025 also stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai J.) 27.01.2026 Rohit/-