Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3806 (HP)

Yadvinder Kumar v. State of HP

CRMPM/175/2026 · 2026-02-23

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Yadvinder Kumar versus State of H.P. Cr.MP(M) No. 175 of 2026 23.02.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for respondent/State. The present application has been filed for condonation of one day delay in filing the revision. It has been asserted that the applicant could not undertake the long journey due to his illness. He visited Shimla on 19.11.2025. The record got mixed with other files in the office of learned counsel and this led to the delay. Hence, the application. No reply is to be filed. The averments in the application are duly supported by an affidavit and there is no reason to disbelieve the same. These are also corroborated by the fact that the revision was prepared on 19.11.2025 and was attested on the same day. The mixing of files in the office of learned counsel cannot held against the applicant. Hence, the present application is allowed and the delay of one day in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision Filing No. 11150 of 2025 The delay in filing the appeal has been ordered to be condoned vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 175 of 2026. Appeal be registered. Notice. Mr. Ajit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Copy of the revision be supplied to the learned Deputy Advocate General for the respondent. The record of learned Trial Court be requisitioned and the matter the listed thereafter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 23rd February, 2026 (Nikita)