Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38055 (CAL)

CHITRATA PAUL v. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/27932/2025 · 2026-09-02

Rishad Medora

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.09.2026 Item No. 26. Court No.22. AB W.P.A. 27932 of 2025 Chitrita Paul Vs State Bank of India & Others Mr. Dipankar Das ….for the Petitioner. Mr. Debasish Saha, Mr. Avirup Roy Sanyal, Mr. J. Sarkar …..for the SBI. 1. The petitioner is represented. 2. The respondent nos.1 and 2, State Bank of India, are also represented. 3. However, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is desirous of withdrawing this writ petition inasmuch as his grievance has been redressed and consequently, this writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, WPA 27932 of 2025 stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. There will be no order as to costs. 6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rishad Medora, J.)