2026:HHC:8820 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution Petition No.172 of 2026 Decided on: 24 th March, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Sohan Lal ....Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development and another ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions from the Corporation, submits that the mandate contained in the judgment dated 05.09.2025, passed in CWP No.13769 of 2025, titled, Sohan Lal vs. HPTDC and another, has been complied with. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner admits 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 the said statement made by learned counsel for the respondents-Corporation. 3. Keeping in view the abovesaid fact and the fact that the judgment passed by this Court has duly been complied with, the execution petition stands fully satis昀椀ed and is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 24 th March, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge