IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62089 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2022 Thana- BHADAUR District- Patna ====================================================== Nagmani Singh @ Nagmani Kumar S/o Shree Kant Singh @ Tauli Singh R/o vill - Baruane, P.S.- Bhadaur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 19-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Bahadur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The informant is son of the deceased. According to his fardbeyan, three persons came on a motorcycle, namely Rajeev Kumar, Nagmani Singh @ Nagmani Kumar (the petitioner) and Rajesh Kumar @ Mithu. It is alleged that the petitioner fired several shots at his father, who died at the spot. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the witnesses are hearsay. The inquest report was prepared at 10:00 A.M. and the fardbeyan was lodged at 11:00 A.M. His Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62089 of 2025(4) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 further submission is that only two firearm injuries are present on the dead body, whereas the allegation is of committing several fire shots. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the informant is an eyewitness. Two firearm injuries were found on the person of the deceased and the widow of the deceased, who was on a morning walk with the deceased, has also corroborated the allegation in her statement. 6. In my view, the petitioner does not deserve the privileges of bail, which is hereby rejected. Nirmal/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T