02.09.2026 Item No.7 Ct. No. 551 RP Rejected C.R.M.(A) 2488 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Palashipara PS Case No.264/2024 dated 26.05.2024 under Sections 341/325/326/307/302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending before the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tehatta, Nadia. And In the matter of : Adar Ali Sk. ...… petitioner Mr. Chitta Ranjan Chakraborty, Advocate Mr. Abdur Rahaman, Advocate Mr. Sunil Banerjee, Advocate .…for the petitioner Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Ld. APP Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi, Advocate .…for the State 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that charge sheet has already been submitted in the case. The petitioner is no longer required for the purpose of investigation. He prays for anticipatory bail. 2. On the other hand, the learned advocate for the State relies upon various materials in the case diary. She refers to the statement of the witnesses as recorded under Section 183 BNSS. 3. Having gone through the materials in the case diary and upon hearing rival submissions of the parties, it transpires that the petitioner has been named by the 2 witnesses that he tied the victim with a tree and assaulted him. As a result of such assault, the victim sustained severe injuries and ultimately died. 4. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and materials in the case diary, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. (MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI J.)