Ashok Laxman Ruptakke v. Uttara Foods and Feeds Private Limited
CP/376/2026 · 2026-08-17
Special Leave Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3804 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3804 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Vaishnavi 48-CP-376-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 376 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5244 OF 2022 Ashok Laxman Ruptakke ...Petitioner V/s. Uttara Foods and Feeds Private Limited ...Respondent ________________ Ms. Samiksha R. Kanani, for Petitioner. Mr. Varun Joshi (through V.C) a/w Mr. Rishabh N. Chaurasia i/b Mr. Chetan Arvind Alai, for Respondent. ________________
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 17 AUGUST 2026 P.C.: 1) Mr. Joshi, the learned counsel appearing for Respondent- employer, invites attention of the Court to order dated 13 July 2026 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, by which the Respondent is
directed to reinstate the Petitioner. However, direction to pay back wages has been stayed. Mr. Joshi submits that, accordingly, the Petitioner has been reinstated in service by letter dated 1 August 2026, with effect from 13 July 2026. Page No.
1 of
2 17 August 2026
Vaishnavi 48-CP-376-2026 2) Ms. Kanani, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, complaints that the Petitioner is made to sit in the security cabin without allotment of any work. However, paragraph 3 of the order dated 13 July 2026 indicates that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has directed that it is not obligatory for the Respondent to take work from the Petitioner. 3) As of now, there appears to be no breach of the order passed by this Court, as modified by the Hon’ble Apex Court. 4) The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of, reserving the liberty for the Petitioner to move again, if necessity arises after disposal of pending SLP before the Supreme Court. 5) The Contempt Petition is disposed of.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No.
2 of
2 17 August 2026