VIJOY KUMAR PANDA @ BIJAY KUMAR PANDA AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/2304/2026 · 2026-09-02
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38020 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38020 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
02.09.2026 Sl. No.11 Ct. No. 446 SG [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (A) 2304 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with G.R. Case No. 385 of 2026 arising out of Kharagpur Town Police Station Case No. 215/2026 dated 02.05.2026 under Sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 74/ 351(3)/ 304(2)/ 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And
In Re: Vijoy Kumar Panda @ Bijay Kumar Panda & Ors. … … Petitioners
Mr. Souradeep Das, Ms. Subhanwita Ghosh. … for the petitioners
Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, ld. APP. Mr. Rajesh Kr. Shah. … for the State
1. Mr. Das, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that the present case has been initiated only to counter a case lodged by the petitioners against the complainant and his men, which was registered as KGP(T) P.S. Case No. 496/25 dated 02.11.2025, the present case has been initiated. He submits that the present petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case out of personal grudge. He prays for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners. 2. Mr. Banerjee, learned Additional Public Prosecutor produces the case diary opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the case diary and other materials on record, including the injury report and the statements of the witnesses recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, respectively. Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the injuries, as well as the fact that the incident occurred in the presence of direct evidence, I am of the view that custodial interrogation of the
2 present petitioners is not necessary and that the privilege under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioners. 4. In view of the above, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. 5. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioners, viz.
(1) Vijoy Kumar Panda @ Bijay Kumar Panda, (2) Pradip @ Amal Kioshore Verma and (3) Deepak Kumar Singh @ Kalu released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kharagpur, Paschim Medinipur and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on further condition petitioners shall meet the investigating officer once in a week till the submission of charge-sheet. 6. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)