Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38010 (KAR)

SHRI MANJUNATH J B v. MANAGEMENT OF M/S SARTRAC ENGINEERING PVT LTD

WP/36282/2024 · 2026-09-01

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010741142024 NC: 2026:KHC:47527 WP No. 36282 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 36282 OF 2024 (L-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI. MANJUNATH J.B., S/O. SRI. BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT GANGARAJU BUILDING, NEAR ANGANWADI, PEMMANAHALLI, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. AVANI CHOKSHI, ADVOCATE) AND: MANAGEMENT OF M/S. SARTRAC ENGINEERING PVT. LTD., NO.127, SOMPURA INDUSTRIAL AREA, DABASPET 3RD PHASE, NIDAVANDA VILLAGE, NELAMANGALA BENGALURU-562132. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PRACHI SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRASHANTH B.K., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010741142024 NC: 2026:KHC:47527 WP No. 36282 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Ms.Avani Chokshi., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Prachi Shetty., counsel on behalf of Sri.Prashanth.B.K., for the respondent appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be disposed of as withdrawn in terms of memo. The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010741142024 NC: 2026:KHC:47527 WP No. 36282 of 2024 As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is disposal of as withdrawn in terms of memo. Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40