Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38009 (CHH)

DR. UTTAM LAL KAUSHIK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7177/2026 · 2026-09-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010380832026 2026:CGHC:42304 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7177 of 2026 Dr. Uttam Lal Kaushik S/o Late Shri Surit Ram Kaushik, Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Post Baroli, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Under Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Director Of Health Services, Directorate Of Health Services, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector, Dhamtari District - Dhamtari (C.G.) 5 - The Collector, District Mohla - Manpur - Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.09.30 10:15:02 +0530 2 (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Harshal Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 29.09.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the Committee constituted under Section 8 of the Transfer Policy, 2025, raising his grievance, and the said representation may be directed to be considered and decided by the Committee in accordance with law. 2. Learned State Counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, without entering into the merits of the case, the petitioner is granted liberty to submit a fresh representation before the Committee constituted under Section 8 of the Transfer Policy, 2025, within a period of ten days from today. 3 4. In the event such a representation is submitted within the aforesaid period, the Committee shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with the applicable Transfer Policy and the rules governing the field, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, within a period of twenty-five days from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. It is made clear that, this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. The Committee shall consider the representation independently, uninfluenced by any observation made in this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of. sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE shoaib