[2026:RJ-JP:13368] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4685/2026 Sachin S/o Shri Hanuman, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Raghavpura, Post Tigriya, Tehsil And Police Station Chaksu, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Choudhary, Adv., for Mr. Anshuman Saxena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.73/2025 registered at Police Station Kotkhawada, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 140(3) and 309(4) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that co-accused persons namely, Dayaram and Kaluram have already been granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submits that none of the injuries sustained by the injured persons are grievous in nature. He argues that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2026:RJ-JP:13368] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4685/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that co-accused persons namely, Dayaram and Kaluram have been granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Sachin S/o Shri Hanuman shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/60