Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38 (PNJ)

STATE OF HARYANA v. JAI SINGH

RFA/5603/2009 · 2026-02-20

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-560 108 (7) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA State of Haryana Jai Singh and others CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) and others Vs. Stat 20.02.2026 sanjay 5603-2009 (O&M) & XOBJR IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA XOBJR Date of Decision: 20.02.2026 State of Haryana Versus Jai Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate Mr. Lekh Raj Nandal, Advocate Mr.Arvinder Arora, Advocate and Mr. Govind Arora, Advocate for the landowners. -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see RFA-1582 and others Vs. State of Haryana, decided vide order of even date. 20.02.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-5603-2009 (O&M) and XOBJR-90-CI-2010 Date of Decision: 20.02.2026 .….Appellant Versus ..….Respondents JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate Mr. Lekh Raj Nandal, Advocate Mr.Arvinder Arora, Advocate and Mr. Govind Arora, Advocate 1582-2000, tilted as Nirmal Singh , decided vide order of even date. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Nirmal Singh , decided vide order of even date. (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.02.26 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document