Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38 (CAL)

SAROJ KUMAR CHAKRABORTY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/20885/2025 · 2026-04-07

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.04.2026 Sl. No.12(DL) Ct. No.14 srm IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 20885 of 2025 Saroj Kumar Chakraborty Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Krishna Pada Santra …for the Petitioner. Ms. Mohuya Dutta Biswas …for the State. 1. Mr. Krishna Pada Santra, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that inadvertent mistakes have been made in the pleadings of the writ petition. He seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. 2. Ms. Mohuya Dutta Biswas, learned Advocate for the State-respondents leaves the matter to the direction of the court. 3. In view of such submissions, the writ petition being WPA 20885 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)