CRWP-10614-2026 1 102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10614-2026 Date of decision: 02.09.2026 Rahul ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARMEET SINGH DEOL Present: Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate (through V.C.) for the petitioner. Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana. **** HARMEET SINGH DEO L , J (Oral): FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 372 03.11.2020 Beri, District Jhajjar 302, 201,459 IPC (corresponding to Sections 103, 238,331(1) of BNS 2023) 1. Seeking parole under the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act 2022, to enable him to perform the necessary tasks as required and to enable him to meet his family members, the petitioner who has been convicted in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant him parole. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be contended and satisfied if directions are issued to decide the representation/application dated 19.06.2026 (P-1) within the time bound manner. 3. Petitioner’s counsel submits that petitioner has filed an appeal against conviction before this Court bearing number CRA-D-162-2024, which is pending. MONIKA RANI 2026.09.03 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10614-2026 2 4. Notices are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, response of the official respondents is not required. 5. Given above, respondent No.4-Superintendent of Jail, District Jail, Jhajjar, is directed to expedite the application dated 19.06.2026 (P-1) filed by the petitioner, within a period of two weeks and respondent No.3 shall decide the same within one week from the date of receipt of report from respondent No.4. It is clarified that order passed must be reasoned one and same be also communicated to the petitioner without any delay. 6. Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. [ ANOOP CHITKARA ] [ HARMEET SINGH DEOL] JUDGE JUDGE 02.09.2026 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2026.09.03 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document