Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3799 (KAR)

AZVASA EDUCATION PVT LTD v. SANDEEPANI EDUCATION TRUST

COMAP/270/2024 · 2026-04-17

C M Poonacha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21001-DB COMAP No. 270 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 270 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. AZVASA EDUCATION PVT. LTD NO.05, 20TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN 2ND STAGE, N.S.PALYA BENGALURU - 560 076 REP. BY ITS OPERATION MANAGER MR. S. GOVINDA RAJAN …APPELLANT (BY SRI M. KESHAVA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SANDEEPANI EDUCATIONAL TRUST NO.40, RING ROAD NAGADEVANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 040 REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN/MANAGING TRUSTEE MR. LOKESHWARAPPA S 2. MR. LOKESHWARAPPA S/O SRI SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.40, RING ROAD NAGADEVANAHALLI JNANABHARATHI POST BENGALURU - 560 040 Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21001-DB COMAP No. 270 of 2024 ALSO AT: NO.450, 3RD CROSS 3RD MAIN, R.R. LAYOUT JNANABHARATI POST NAGADEVANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 056 …RESPONDENTS THIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13 (1-A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURT ACT 2015 PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND MODIFY THE ORDER OF THE COMMERCIAL COURT DATED 30/05/2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LXXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-85) (COMMERCIAL COURT), BENGALURU IN COMMERCIAL O.S NO.1704/2022 WITH COST AS FOLLOWS & ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. None appears for the appellant. However, the learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal and for refund of the court fee. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21001-DB COMAP No. 270 of 2024 2. This is the 12th time that the appeal has been listed before the court & the concerned Registrar for curing the defects. We do not consider it apposite to direct the refund of the entire court fee. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The court fee is directed to be refunded to the extent of 50% if the admissible as per the Rules. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE SD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8