1 CGHC010319872026 2026:CGHC:42597 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6189 of 2026 Jai Singh S/o Late Shri Sukhi Ram Aged About 51 Years Currently Posted As Headmaster, Government Middle School, Beltukri, Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh R/o 408, Pooja Paradise, New Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Block Education Officer Development Block Bilha, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.09.30 17:23:17 +0530 2 5 - Bhupendra Kaushik Block Education Officer, Development Block Bilha, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Suryakant Kevat Assistant Grade Clerk, Office Of The Block Education Officer, Development Block Belha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 30.09.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner’s application dated 04.05.2026 seeking withdrawal of the amount from his General Provident Fund (GPF) account. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, after sanctioning the withdrawal of an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/-, the said amount has been credited to the petitioner’s account. The said fact has not been disputed by the petitioner. Learned 3 counsel for the respondent further submits that, in view of the aforesaid payment, the relief sought by the petitioner has already been redressed. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission and as the relief sought by the petitioner has already been redressed, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Shoaib