IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60840 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2024 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Himmat Rai @ Himmat Yadav S/o Lalan Ray R/o vill - Pakaha Road, P.S.- Baikunthpur, Distt.- Gopalganj, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madan Mohan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 09-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 22-12-2024, a panchayati was convened in between the family members of the petitioner and the informant for resolving the prevailing land dispute; and in the panchayati, the accused persons assaulted the family members of the informant with knife and lathi, it is further alleged that this petitioner assaulted Yadav Lal Rai by knife causing injury on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60840 of 2025(3) dt.09-01-2026 2/2 chest. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant alleges that petitioner stabbed Yadav Lal Rai from behind by knife, but then the injury has been found on chest, on which the learned APP submits that FIR is not an encyclopedia and there is a specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting Yadav Lal Rai by knife and the injury caused on chest of Yadav Lal has been opined to be grievous in nature. 5. Considering the submission made by learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T