Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37956 (PNJ)

SEHDEV KOUSHAL & OTHERS v. VIJAYENDRA KUMAR, IAS & OTHERS

COCP/3674/2026 · 2026-09-02

Vikas Suri

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 COCP-3674-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.09.2026 Sehdev Koushal and others ...Petitioners Versus Vijayendra Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. J.S. Rozera, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Praveen Kumar, DAG, Haryana. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Writ Court in CWP-7774-2026, which was disposed of in terms of CWP-7437-2025 titled as ‘Renu and others vs. State of Haryana and others’ decided on 24.12.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. Upon notice having been issued, learned State counsel had put in appearance and sought two weeks time to have instructions and to file compliance affidavit. 3. On resumed hearing today, learned State counsel submits that in deference to the aforesaid order dated 16.03.2026, petitioner Nos.1 to 6 have been allowed to continue in service and they have also SUMIT KUMAR 2026.09.03 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-3674-2026 (O&M) -2- joined their respective posts, whereas petitioner No.7 has not come forward, though, the department has allowed petitioner No.7 to continue in deference to the aforesaid order dated 16.03.2026. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after having fresh instructions, affirms that petitioner Nos.1 to 6 have joined service, however, he has not been able to contact petitioner No.7. He further submits that in view of the subsequent developments and categoric stand taken by learned State counsel qua petitioner No.7, the present petition be disposed of as not pressed any further with liberty to petitioner No.7 to revive the petition, if so required. 5. Disposed of as not pressed with liberty aforesaid. 6. Rule stands discharged. (VIKAS SURI) September 02, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.09.03 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment