Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37955 (CAL)

MD WASIM FIROJ @ MD WASHIM FIROZ v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1893/2026 · 2026-09-03

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L65 03.09.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (NDPS)1893 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Md Wasim Firoj @ Md Washim Firoz Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen. …for the petitioner. Mr. Subhas Chandra Saha Mr. Ayon Shubhra Bandyopadhyay. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instruction not to proceed with the present bail application. Learned advocate for the State has submitted a memo of evidence which reflects commercial quantity of contraband being seized. Be that as it may, as the petitioner do not intend to proceed with the bail application, CRM(NDPS)1893 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 2 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)