Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37952 (CHH)

MORDHWAJ SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5772/2022 · 2026-09-25

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010412542022 2026:CGHC:41906 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5772 of 2022 1 - Mordhwaj Sahu S/o Shri Kartikram Sahu Aged About 35 Years Working As P. G. T. Lecturer (Physic) At Eklavya Adarsh Awasiy Vidyalaya Karpawand, Block- Bakawand, District- Bastar At Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Scheduled Tribes And Scheduled Cast Development, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector And President District Level Chhattisgarh Triable Development And Educational Institude Eklavya Adarsh Awasiy Vidyalaya Karpawand, Block- Bakawand, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Assistant Commissioner District Level, Triable Cast Development Residential And Educational Institute Committee, Jagdalpur, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 4 - The Principal Eklavya Adarsh Awasiy Vidyalaya Karpawand, Block- Bakawand District-Baster At Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 26/09/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to consider and decide pending application of the petitioner, within stipulated period. 10.2 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the cost of the petition may be given.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh in case exigency arises. 3. Permission is granted. 4. No objection has been raised from other side. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat