IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58737 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Raj Ballabh Mahto @ Chacha Raj Ballabh Mahto son of Late Ram Prasad Mahto Resident of Village- -Akhtiyarpur Sehan, P.S.- Goraul, (katahara Op) District- Vaishali 2. Rajgir Mahto son of Late Ram Prasad Mahto Resident of Village- -Akhtiyarpur Sehan, P.S.- Goraul, (katahara Op) District- Vaishali 3. Anita Devi Wife of Rajigir Mahto Resident of Village- -Akhtiyarpur Sehan, P.S.- Goraul, (katahara Op) District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sapna Kumari Daughter of Amrit Kumar Resident of Village- -Akhtiyarpur Sehan, P.S.- Goraul, (katahara Op) District- Vaishali ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vasant Vikas For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binay Krishna Mr. Ravi Nandan Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6 15-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 64, 324(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 4/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(1)(s), 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are the family members of the main accused Nitesh Kumar. There is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58737 of 2025(6) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. He further submits that the petitioners are being harassed because of the dispute with Nitesh Kumar. 5. Learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the allegation of SC/ST Act seems to be superfluous and has been added only to make the case serious, therefore, this application for anticipatory bail stands allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U