IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59481 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2024 Thana- AMDABAD District- Katihar ====================================================== Munna Ravidas @ Munna Rabidas S/o- Nipen Ravidas Resident of Village- Badan Tola PS- Amdabad, Dist- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. X D/o- Sudam Mandal Village- Ganesh Tola Ps- Amdabad Dist- Katihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad For the State : Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman For the Informant : Mr. Bimal Kumar Mr. Birendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 5 19-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 261 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 64, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 4 of POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, on 21.12.2024, the petitioner committed rape upon the informant. It is further alleged that the petitioner’s mother had previously pressured her regarding marriage and when informant told her father about the matter, all co- accused persons threatened informant’s father. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that in the first breath, the victim makes allegation on the petitioner to establish physical relations at the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59481 of 2025(5) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 pretext of marriage but in the same breath, she again stated that mother of the petitioner was asking her for marriage with the petitioner to which she complained to her father. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and is under custody since 22.04.2025. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. The portion of fardbeyan of the victim is not in confirmity with the subsequent portion thereof and the petitioner is in custody for near about nine months. 7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-7th-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Katihar in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 261 of 2024, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T