Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3794 (JHR)

AJAJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

WPC/7749/2025 · 2026-01-21

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1586 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.7749 of 2025 .... 1. Ajaj Ansari, son of Md. Salim Ansari, Aged about 43 years, Resident of Vill- Karikhokho, P.O.-Nawadih, P.S. Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 2. Md. Samasudin, son of Latif Minya, Aged about 44 years, Resident of Vill- Karikhokho, P.O.-Nawadih, P.S. Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 3. Mohammad Naushad Ansari, son of Kabir Miya, Aged about 38 years, Resident of Vill-Ward Number 4 Majhiladih, P.O. Mahugain, P.S.- Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 4. Tahir Ansari, son of Sadiq Ansari, Aged about 41 years, Resident of Vill- Ward Number 4 Majhiladih, P.O. Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 5. Firoz Ansari, son of Inam Ansari, Aged about 22 years, Resident of Vill- Majhiladih, Panchayat Kadodih, Ward number 4, P.O. Mahugain, P.S.- Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 6. Jalal Ansari, son of Mukhtar Ansari, aged about 36 years, Resident of Vill- Ward number 4 Dainibad, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 7. Anwar Ansari, son of Rajjak Ansari, Aged about 32 years, Resident of Vill- Ward number 4, Panchayat Kadodih, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.- Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 8. Rahmat Ansari, son of Ramjan Miyan, Aged about 37 years, Resident of Vill- Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 9. Sabba Ahmad, son of Mohammad Ansari, Aged about 32 years, Resident of Vill-Ward number 4, Panchayat Kadodih, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.- Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 10. Minhaj Khan, son of Anwar Khan, Aged about 35 years, Resident of Vill- Panchayat Kadodih, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 11. Sahid Ansari, son of Majhar Ansari, Aged about 26 years, Resident of Vill- Ward number 4, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 12. Ajmat Ansari, son of Imtiyaz Ansari, Aged about 26 years, Resident of Vill- Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 13. Yunus Ansari, son of Md. Habib Miya, Aged about 61 years, Resident of Vill-Ward number 4, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 14. Khuraban Ansari, son of Wali Mohammad, Aged about 39 years, Resident of Vill-Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 15. Tabarak Ansari, son of Mohammad Ansari, Aged about 34 years, Resident of Vill-Majhiladih, Mahugain, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 16. Samim Ansari, son of Wasir Miya, Aged about 35 years, Resident of Vill- Ward number 4, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 17. Shahbaz Khan, son of Anwar Khan, Aged about 27 years, Resident of Vill- Panchayat Kadodih, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 18. Md Saddam Ansari, son of Md. Yunus Anasari, Aged about 31 years, Resident of Vill-Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 2026:JHHC:1586 2 W.P.(C) No.7749 of 2025 19. Belal Ansari, son of Akbar Ansari, Aged about 27 years, Resident of Vill- Ward number 4, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 20. Sabir Ansari, son of Guljar Ansari, Aged about 28 years, Resident of Vill- Ward number 4, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 21. Md. Saddam Ansari, son of Nazir Ansari, Aged about 33 years, Resident of Vill-Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 22. Akhtar Ansari, son of Noor Mohammad, Aged about 48 years, Resident of Vill-Ward number 4, Majhiladih, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markachcho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 23. Imtiyaj Bharti, son of Mohammad Hidayat, Aged about 36 years, Resident of Vill-Karikhokho, P.O.-Nawadih, P.S.-Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 24. Md. Muslim, son of Ishak Miyan, Aged about 58 years, Resident of Panchyat-Purnanagar, P.O.-Nawadih, P.S.-Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 25. Abdul Habib Ansari, son of Jafar Ali, Aged about 55 years, Resident of Ward No.7, Panchyat-Purnanagar, Vill-Karikhokho, P.O.-Nawadih, P.S.- Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 26. Mohammad Mubarak, son of Salim Miyan, Aged about 45 years, Resident of Ward no 7, Panchyat-Purnanagar, Vill-Karikhokho, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.- Markachcho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand .… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. Deputy Commissioner, Koderma, office at Collectorate Building, Koderma, P.O. & P.S. Sadar, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 4. Superintendent of Police, Koderma, office at Koderma, P.O. & P.S. Sadar, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 5. Sub-Divisional Officer, Koderma, office at Koderma, P.O. & P.S. Sadar, District-Koderma, Jharkhand 6. Circle Officer, Markacho, office at Markacho, P.O.+P.S. Markacho, District- Koderma, Jharkhand 7. Haji Wali Mohammad, son of Late Sahdul Miyan 8. Mansur Alam, son of Jalil Miyan 9. Md. Muslim Ansari, son of Late Abdul Miyan (Respondents No.7 to 9 are residents of Village-Mahugain, P.O.-Mahugain, P.S.-Markacho, District-Koderma, Jharkhand) .... Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Naresh Pd. Thakur, Adv. For the Resp.-State : Mr. Zaid Imam, AC to SC-VII .... 02/21.01.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- 2026:JHHC:1586 3 W.P.(C) No.7749 of 2025 “1. For the issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s), particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, Commanding the State Respondents, particularly the Deputy Commissioner and Superintendent of Police, Koderma (Respondents No. 3 & 4), to uphold, protect, and ensure the peaceful exercise of the petitioners' and the community's long-standing customary and fundamental right to conduct the annual Muharram Tazia procession and assembly on the traditional grounds at Khata No. 28, Plot No. 176, Mauza-Manjhladih, District Koderma. 2. Issuing a further writ in the nature of Prohibition or any other appropriate writ, restraining the Private Respondents (No. 7-9), their family members, associates, or any person acting on their behalf, from creating any manner of obstruction, interference, or hindrance to the peaceful ingress, assembly, and performance of rituals by the petitioners and other villagers on the said land during the period of the Muharram festival. 3. Further for Directing the State Respondents to formulate a permanent mechanism or issue standing orders to the local administration to ensure the peaceful and dispute-free conduct of this annual religious event in all subsequent years, to prevent the recurrence of such disputes. 4. Further to pass an ad-interim mandatory order, directing the Respondent authorities to immediately take all necessary steps, including deployment of adequate police force and issuance of necessary prohibitory orders against potential troublemakers, to facilitate the peaceful and unobstructed conduct of the Tazia procession for the upcoming Muharram festival during the pendency of this writ application.” 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out their remedy in accordance with law. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 21.01.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 22.01.2026