Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3794 (GAU)

MD. FAKRUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.

WP(C)/6494/2025 · 2026-02-15

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010251532025 2026:GAU-AS:2326 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6494/2025 MD. FAKRUL ISLAM S/O- ABDUR RAB, RESIDENT OF- 125, N H 54 ROAD, NEAR JAME MASJID, NILBAGAN, HOJAI, DISTRICT- HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN-782445 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN (ASSAM SECRETARIAT COMPLEX), DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPTT. JANATA BHAWAN (ASSAM SECRETARIAT COMPLEX) DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007 4:THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI- 781003 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HOJAI DISTRICT ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 6:THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HOJAI DISTRICT ASSAM 7:THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER HOJAI DISTRICT ASSAM 8:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE HOJAI POLICE STATION ASSA Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. AR Bhuyan Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. J Handique, Govt. Advocate, Assam Ms. R Kataky for Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Deptt. B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 16.02.2026 Mr. AR Bhuyan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner would not like to further proceed with the instant writ petition taking into account that the petitioner now would approach the respondent authorities for ventilating his grievances. 2. Ms. R Kataky, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Department and Mr. J Handique, the learned Government Advocate who appears on behalf of the State respondents. Page No.# 3/3 3. Accordingly, in view of the above submission, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant