- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010272092020 NC: 2026:KHC:47790 WP No. 13851 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 13851 OF 2020 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SRI. B.M.SATHISHA, S/O. MADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, DIVISIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEER, KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOLAR DIVISION, R/O. NO. 95, BISANAHALLI, NADAVATTI (POST), VIA KADUGODI, BENGALURU- 560 067. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJAYA S.NAYAKA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. H.N.BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560 001. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICE, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU- 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR M., AGA R1; SMT. H.R.RENUKA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010272092020 NC: 2026:KHC:47790 WP No. 13851 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Sanjaya S.Nayaka, counsel on behalf of Sri.H.N.Basavaraju, for the petitioner, Sri.Rajakumar.M., Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1 and Smt.H.R.Renuka, counsel for respondent No.2 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner orally submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Petitioner also submits that the memo for withdrawal may be dismissed as not pressed. The oral submission is placed on record. Memo for withdrawal is dismissed as not pressed. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010272092020 NC: 2026:KHC:47790 WP No. 13851 of 2020 As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9