02.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 289. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 1743 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Beniapukur Police Station/DD Case No. 180 dated 28.10.2024 under Sections 61/96/143/144/64 of BNS, 2023 and Section 4,4/17 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 3/4/5/6/7 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. And In the matter of : Javed Ali @ Md. Javed Ali ……Petitioner. Mr. Amlan Biswas Mr. Amitesh Chakraborty ……for the Petitioner. Ms. Jhuma Sen Mr. Samsul Laskar ….for the Victim. Mr. Amartya Ghose Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since October, 2024. There is no possibility of the trial being concluded in near future and the petitioner has not been specifically identified by the victims. Learned advocate for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. 2 State has referred to the case diary as well as the evidence of the victim. Evidence of the victim reflects direct complicity of the petitioner in exploitation. Having regard to the role of the petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail as there is some corroboration to the statement of facts and the charges of the prosecution. With the aforesaid observations bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 1743 of 2026 is rejected at this stage. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)