TAWSEEF MOHAMMAD PAHLOO v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SADAR AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
CRM(M)/36/2024 · 2026-10-05
Yash Paul Bourney
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3791 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3791 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 36/2024 CrlM(61/2024).
Tawseef Mohammad Pahloo.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate.
VERSUS
U T of J & K & Anr.
Through: None.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE YASH PAUL BOURNEY, JUDGE.
ORDER 05.10.2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition, particularly in view of the fact that some of the witnesses have already been examined before the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(YASH PAUL BOURNEY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 05.10.2026 Bisma Jan.
S. No. 61 Regular