1 CGHC010349832026 2026:CGHC:42475-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 919 of 2026 Santosh Kumar Shriwas S/o Shri Krishna Kumar Shriwas Aged About 32 Years Occupation- Stenographer, R/o House No. 153, Shivansh Sadan, Ward No.18, Shiv Mandir Road, Khairagarh, Police Station Khairagarh, District Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.) ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya Khairagarh, Through Its Registrar, District Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan- Gandai (C.G.) 3 - The Registrar Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya, Khairagarh, District Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan- Gandai (C.G.) 4 - Ku. Bhuneshwari D/o Shri Madan Singh Thakur Aged About 32 Years Occupation- Stenographer, Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya, Khairagarh, District Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Nirupama Bajpai, Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Ujjawal Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.10.01 10:54:42 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Santosh Sharma, Judge Order on Board Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra , Chief Justice 30.09.2026 1. Heard Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.1 / State, Ms. Nirupama Bajpai, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr. Ujjawal Agrawal, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Siddharth Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No. 4. 2. This writ appeal has been preferred assailing the judgment dated 10.07.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 8421/2023 (Annexure A/1). 3. It is submitted by Mr. Khetrapal, learned counsel for the appellant, that WPS No. 8421/2023 was heard along with WPS No. 4204/2020 and both the matters were disposed of by a common judgment dated 10.07.2026. It is further submitted that the writ appeal arising out of WPS No. 4204/2020 has already been disposed of vide order dated 28.09.2026, with the following observation:- “In view of the above, the writ appeal is disposed of with an observation that if a properly constituted review petition is filed, the same may be considered in accordance with law.” 3 4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the appellant prays that this writ appeal deserves similar treatment. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents do not have any objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant. 6. In view of the above, the writ appeal is disposed of with an observation that if a properly constituted review petition is filed against the judgment dated 10.07.2026 in respect of WPS No. 8421/2023, the same may be considered in accordance with law, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet