Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 379 (RAJ)

BABULAL @ BABU S/O SHRI RAMNATH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16017/2025 · 2026-03-18

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11453] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16017/2025 Babulal @ Babu S/o Shri Ramnath, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Bada Kua, Malakheda, P.s. Malakheda, District Alwar (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shandilya For State For Complainant : : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Vinod Kumar, ASI, Police Station Malakheda, Alwar Mr. Raj Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.432/2025 registered at Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 127(2), 109(1) of BNS. 2. On 05.03.2026, considering the warrants of the case, Investigating Officer was directed to remain present in the Court. 3. In compliance of the same, Investigating Officer has marked presence today, and submitted that charge-sheet has been filed qua the applicants and final report in the case of non-applicant has been filed as it is a case of cross-FIRs. 4. Heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:11453] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16017/2025] 5. It is analyzed from the record that the injury No.5 was life threatening and grievous in nature and that the applicant was in the hospital for a period of 14 days. It is also analyzed that apart from the aforementioned injuries, there were four other injuries and at the time when applicant was admitted, his BP was 90/60 mm and he was on ventilator, blood transfusion and FFP transfer was also done. It is also analyzed that the allegations are under Section 109 of BNS. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the nature of case, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present bail application. 7. Present bail application is accordingly, dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /26