Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37891 (PNJ)

DEVENDER v. VIKRAM , M.D. UHVPNL AND ORS

COCP/4241/2026 · 2026-09-03

Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AT CHANDIGARH 106 COCP-4241-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.09.2026 DEVENDER ...... Petitioner VERSUS VIKRAM , MANAGING DIRECTOR, UHVPNL AND ORS ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA *** Present :- Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate with Mr. Akash Choudhary, Mr. Jatin Sardana and Mr. Vipul Thakur, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Advocate for the respondents. *** Deepinder Singh Nalwa, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner, by way of present contempt petition, seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 08.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CWP No.8143 of 2023. 2. A perusal of the order dated 08.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court would show that the writ petition was to be treated as a representation and a direction was given to the respondents to consider the same by passing a speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the said order. RIMPAL RANI 2026.09.03 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-4241-2026 :2: 3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the order dated 08.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) has been complied with and a speaking order has been passed on 07.04.2026. The copy of the order dated 07.04.2026 is taken on record as Mark-A. A copy of the same has also been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In light of the above said facts, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present contempt petition. However, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the same, if so advised. 5. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed, with the liberty as prayed for. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of accordingly. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE 03.09.2026 Rimpal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RIMPAL RANI 2026.09.03 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document