Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37889 (PNJ)

BEER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/13931/2026 · 2026-09-02

Divya Sharma, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13931-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2026 BEER SINGH AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Parkash Chahar, Addl. A.G.Haryana. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ***** VIKAS BAHL , J. (ORAL) In the head note of the petition, the following prayers have been made:- “Civil Writ petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ especially in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned notices U/s 24 (1) of Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, dated 09.03.2026 (Annexure P-1 & P-2) and Section 24 (2) of Haryana Panchayati Raj Act dated 05.04.2026 (Annexure P-5 & P-6) issued by the respondent No. 5 illegally as there is no valid demotion was conducted and mentioned Ahata No. 74 mentioned and the petitioners have no concerned with is land and the respondent No. 5 without issue any notice demolished the cow dung store, which is adjacent to the house of petitioners due to political revelry, illegally and against the settled preposition of law. SMRITI 2026.09.05 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-13931-2026 (O&M) -2- AND Further prayed to issue direction to the respondent No. 1 to 4 to take action against respondent no. 5 who are harassing the petitioners one pretext to other and demolished the possession of petitioners and may direct to consider/decide the representation dated 13.04.2026 (Annexure P-8 & P-11). AND It is further prayed to direct the official respondent to take action against the respondent No. 5 for issuance of Notice under section 24 (1) and (2) under Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 to the petitioners while the petitioners have no concern with that land and illegally without issuing notice trying to demolish the land of petitioners and the petitioners had also replied to the notice Under section 24 (1) of Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. AND It is further prayed that the impugned notices dated 09.03.2026 (Annexure P-1 & P-2) and dated 05.04.2026 (Annexure P-5 & P-6) issued by the respondent No. 5 may kindly be stayed during pendency of the present petition. OR Further issuance of any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem fit in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case.” Learned counsel for the respondent(s) has submitted that apart from other aspects, impugned notices are appealable, whereas, the petitioners, in para 13 have stated that they have no other alternative remedy except to approach this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the same, he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal, in accordance with law. SMRITI 2026.09.05 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-13931-2026 (O&M) -3- Keeping in view the above-said facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (DIVYA SHARMA) JUDGE 02.09.2026 smriti Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No SMRITI 2026.09.05 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment