2026:HHC:5145 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 2110 of 2026 Decided on : 02.03.2026 Krishan Chand Thakur …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Shubham Sood, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representations (Annexure P-6 and Annexure P-7) with regard to the issues raised in the petition, but the same have not been decided by the Authority concerned till date. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:5145 3. Accordingly, as prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let representations (Annexure P-6 & Annexure P-7) of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within a period of 12 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 02, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)