Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37869 (CHH)

PARAS RAM SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7186/2026 · 2026-09-29

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010383392026 2026:CGHC:42476 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7186 of 2026 Paras Ram Sahu S/o Late Shri Ramcharan Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Sewaniwtri Akushal Sharmik Karyalaya Karypalan Abhiyanta Lok Nirman Vibhag Rastiyay Rajaymarg Sambhagh Karmank 1 Raipur Niwashi 118 Aawak Para Ward No 10, Gram Shyamnagar Baroda Jila Gariyabandh Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Sachiv Lok Nirman Vibhag Mahanadi Bhawan Nawa Raipur Jila Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Mushay Abhiyanta Lok Nirman Vibhag Rastiy Rajaymarg Vibhag Raipur Jila Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mukhay Abhiyanta Lok Nirman Vibhag Rastiy Rajaymarg Vibhag Raipur Jila Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Karaypalan Abhiyanta Karyalay Karypalan Abhiyanta Raastiy Rajyamarg Khand Raipur Jila Raipur Chhattisgah SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.09.30 13:35:59 +0530 2 5 - Sayukat Sanchalak Kosh Lekha Our Pension Raipur Sambhag Jila Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sakshi Bajpai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 30.09.2026 1. The limited relief that the Petitioner seeks for in the present Writ Petition is for an appropriate direction to the Respondents for considering the claim of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the Petitioner, he has made his claim in the light of the recent decision of this High Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3 3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claim of all similarly placed person in the light of the aforesaid decision of this High Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib