S/L 100 27.08.2026 Court No.655 Swd IN THE High COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CO 73 of 2026 Kalyani Kar Vs. Juin Pyne & Anr Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, Ms. Tithli Piplai. … for the Petitioner. 1. Learned Advocate representing the petitioner is present. 2. The instant revisional application has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the impugned order dated 26.11.2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in connection with Title Suit No. 363 of 2020, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 7 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 came to be allowed. 3. It is submitted by the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner that, during the pendency of the present revisional application, the direction passed by this Court by its order dated 26.11.2025 has already been duly complied with. In view of such subsequent development, it is contended that no further effective order remains to be passed in the present proceeding. 2 4. Upon considering the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate and upon perusal of the materials available on record, it appears that the order passed by the learned Trial Court in relation to the application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 7 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has already been acted upon and the direction of this Court dated 26.11.2025 has also been complied with. 5. In such circumstances, continuation of the present revisional proceeding would serve no useful purpose, as there remains no surviving issue requiring adjudication by this Court. A revisional proceeding under Article 227 is intended to secure proper exercise of jurisdiction by the subordinate Court and effective adjudication of a subsisting grievance. Where the order under challenge has already been implemented and the subsequent directions of this Court have been complied with, no effective or meaningful relief can any longer be granted to the petitioner in the present proceeding. 6. Accordingly, in view of the subsequent compliance and the changed circumstances, the present revisional application has become infructuous. 7. The instant revisional application be and the same is hereby dismissed. 8. There shall be no order as to costs. 9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Trial Court. 3 10. Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)