Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37861 (CAL)

SUDARSHAN MANDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1866/2026 · 2026-09-02

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.09.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.71 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 1866 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with English Bazar Police Station Case No. 76 of 2026 dated 14.01.2026 under Sections 21(C)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. And In Re : Sudarshan Mandal ... Petitioner. Mr. Sourov Mondal, Mr. Subhrajyoti Das ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Saha, Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is similarly situated as other accused person who has been granted bail. The subject-matter of the present case relates to alleged recovery of 525 grams of Brown Sugar from the joint possession of the petitioner and another. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that so far as the present petitioner is concerned, there are criminal antecedents relating to Kaliachak P.S. Case No. 1063 of 2020 and Kaliachak P.S. Case No. 1190 of 2021. Rebutting such submission of the State, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been granted bail in the said cases after he was in custody for two years. 2 Having considered the fact that in the previous case, petitioner was granted bail as the trial could not proceed and while on bail, from the joint possession of the petitioner and another, there has been recovery, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 1866 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)