1 CGHC010160492023 2026:CGHC:42628 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 765 of 2023 1 - Nirasha Bai Nishad, W/o Late Dukhit Nishad, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kaheka Post Chilfi PS And Tahsil Saja District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 2 - Jyoti Nishad D/o Late Dukhit Nishad, Aged About 16 Years, Juvenile Through Natural Guardian Mother Nirasha Bai W/o Late Dukhit Nishad, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kaheka Post Chilfi PS And Tahsil Saja District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ganesh Kumar Nishad S/o Late Dukhit Nishad, Aged About 13 Years, Juvenile Through Natural Guardian Mother Nirasha Bai W/o Late Dukhit Nishad, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kaheka Post Chilfi PS And Tahsil Saja District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 4 - Umesh Kumar Nishad S/o Late Dukhit Nishad, Aged About 11 Years, Juvenile Through Natural Guardian Mother Nirasha Bai W/o Late Dukhit Nishad, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kaheka Post Chilfi PS And Tahsil Saja District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants versus 1 - Yuvraj Chandrasen S/o Khem Singh Chandrasen Aged About 36 Years R/o Silhati, Police Chowki Podi PS And Tahsil Bodla District Kabirdham Chahttisgarh (Driver) 2 - Abdul Hamiz S/o Zakir Khan R/o Hose No. 13/196 Taiba Chowk Talapara Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Owner) 3 - The National Insurance Company Limited, Through The Divisional Manager Divisional Office, Akash Ganga Complex Supela Bhilai, G.E. Road Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh (Insurance Company) PRASHANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2026.10.01 11:15:40 +0530 2 4 - Jagnuram Nishad S/o Late Panchram Nishad, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Kaheka Post Chilfi PS And Tahsil Saja District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 5 - Aganiya Bai W/o Shri Jagnuram Nishad, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Kaheka Post Chilfi PS And Tahsil Saja District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None For Respondents No.1 and 5 : Notice issued is still awaited For Respondent No.2 : Notice issued has been returned unserved For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Ratan Pusty, Advocate For Respondent No.4 : None, though served Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (30/09/2026) 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants against the order passed by the Tribunal dismissing their claim petition. 2. Earlier the case was listed on 10/11/2025 and 01/04/2026, however, on these occasions none had appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellants. Even today, when the case is called, none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellants. 3. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non- prosecution. 4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Prashant