1 CGHC010031372026 2026:CGHC:42794 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 397 of 2026 Ambrish Dutt Agrawal (In Person) S/o Late Shri Angira Kumar Agrawal Aged About 51 Years R/o- Neora Bada, Near Chandra Complex, Gudhiyari, P.S. Gudhiyari, District Raipur (C.G.) Pin 492009 ... Appellant. Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its In-Charge Of Police Station- Special Police Station (Atrocities), Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 - Suruj Bai Agrawal W/o Shri Sukhdev Lal Agrawal Aged About 70 Years R/o Gram- Mohbhatta, Tehsil- Simga, Thana- Hathbandh, Distt. Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Shravan Kumar Agrawal S/o Sukhdev Lal Agrawal Aged About 63 Years R/o Gram And Thana Hathbandh, Near- Railway Station, Tehsil- Simga, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 4 - Uma Kiran Agrawal W/o Shrivan Kumar Agrawal Aged About 59 Years R/o Gram And Thana Hathbandh, Near- Railway Station, Tehsil- Simga, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 5 - Hemant Agrawal S/o Shukhdev Lal Agrawal Aged About 56 Years R/o Infront Of Mangharam And Sons, Chanda Complex, Near Goyal Enterprises Gudhiyari, Thana- Gudhiyari, District- Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Jayant Agrawal S/o Sukhdev Lal Agrawal Aged About 53 Years Working At Bhilai Steel Plant, R/o Gram Mohbhatta, Tehsil Simga, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN 2 7 - Anand Agrawal S/o Sukhdev Lal Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o Gopala Vrindavan Colony, Tarenga Road, Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 8 - Shandkar Lal Agrawal S/o Late Shri Bharat Lal Agrawal Aged About 65 Years R/o Gram- Mohbhatta, Tehsil- Simga, Thana- Bhatapara Gramin, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 9 - Rishi Agrawal S/o Late Shri Ashok Kumar Agrawal Aged About 53 Years R/o B-30, Green Orchid, Avani Vihar, Daldal Sivani, Mova, P.S. Mova, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents. (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Appellant : Appellant in person For State : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Govt. Advocate. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 01/10/2026 1. This case is listed on default regarding maintainability. 2. By way of this appeal, the appellant is challenging following different orders : (i) the order dated 16.07.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (Atrocities), Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.), in Special Sessions Case No.03/2025, whereby the case was remitted back to the Court of learned C.J.M., Balodabazar; (ii) the subsequent order dated 24.10.2025 passed by the learned C.J.M., Balodabazar, in Criminal Case No.2936/2025, whereby charges under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the I.P.C. were framed against the accused; and (iii) the order dated 02.12.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Balodabazar, in Criminal Revision No.1388/2025, whereby the criminal revision preferred by the petitioner/appellant against the aforesaid order dated 24.10.2025 was dismissed. 3 3. Thus, the appellant is challenging three different orders passed by three different Courts in three separate proceedings. Therefore, the Registry has rightly pointed out the default that the present appeal, in the manner in which it has been drafted, is not maintainable. 4. At this stage, the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal, in accordance with law, against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (Atrocities), Balodabazar, in Special Sessions Case No. 03/2025 (State of C.G. Vs. Suraj Bai Agrawal and others). 5. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made by the appellant. 6. In view of the above, the present appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and is accordingly disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. 7. It is made clear that the liberty so granted shall be availed of by the appellant within a period of 30 days from today. 8. As prayed, the certified copies of the impugned orders be returned to the appellant after retaining photocopies thereof. 9. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay