Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37847 (CHH)

Bansal Mettalics India Private Limited v. Union Of India

WPC/3069/2017 · 2026-09-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010011362017 2026:CGHC:42365 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3069 of 2017 1 - Bansal Mettalics India Private Limited A Company Duly Incorporated Under The Relevant Provisions Of The Indian Companies Act, 1956 Having Its Registered Office At Telghani Naka Chowk, Oppsite Mittal Complex, Raipur Chhattisgarh, Through Its Director Shri Ankur Bansal, S/o Shri Bajrang Bansal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o House No. 10, Sehkari Marg No. 1, Chowbey Colony Raipur Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh , Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Secretary Of Ministry Of Road, Trasport And Highways Government Of India, New Delhi , Delhi 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - National Highways Authority Of India, Through Its Project Director, Raipur Bilaspur National Highway No. 200/30, Widening Of National Highways No. 200/30 Bypass Tatibandh Dhaneli, District Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Project Director, National Highway Authority Of India, P I U, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Competent Authority Cum Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue And Land Acquisition NIRMALA RAO 2 Officer , District Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Punj Lloyd Limited, Raipur Site Office Village, Kapasda, Dharsiva, Raipur Tilda Road Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Applicant/s : Shri Ankur Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent/ UOI : Shri Ramakant Mishra, Dy.S.G. For Respondent/ State : Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 29.09.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Permission is granted. 4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi