RAMAPPA S/O LATE PUTTAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/4734/2022 · 2026-08-28
E S Indiresh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37838 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37838 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010094912022 NC: 2026:KHC:46480 WP No. 4734 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 4734 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
RAMAPPA S/O LATE PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURIST
2.
LOKESHAPPA S/O RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURIST
BOTH ARE R/OF HIREKATTUR VILLAGE BELENAHALLI, TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577228. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADV.)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKKAMAGALUR-577101.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TARIKERE SUB - DIVISION TARIKERE-577228.
Digitally signed by NANJUNDACHARI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010094912022 NC: 2026:KHC:46480 WP No. 4734 of 2022
4.
THE TAHSILDAR TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577228. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, IS PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER OF MUTATION PASSED BY R4 IN MR NO.H13 DATED 16.08.2021 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G AND DIRECT THE ENTRY OF NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE RTC OF SURVEY NO.15 OF H RANGAPURA VILLAGE, TARIKERE TALUK.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the entry in MR.No.H13 dated 16.08.2021 (Annexure-G).
2. In that view of the matter, the petitioners are having an efficacious remedy under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and as a result, the writ petition does not survive for consideration.
3. Needless to say that in the event if the petitioners challenge the impugned order passed by the respondent No.4 before the respondent No.3 as mentioned
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010094912022 NC: 2026:KHC:46480 WP No. 4734 of 2022
above within 4 weeks from the receipt of this order, the period spent by petitioners before this Court shall be condoned under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
4. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
NC CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7