Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37829 (CHH)

RAUT RAKHI GOPAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/911/2026 · 2026-09-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010362982026 2026:CGHC:42291 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 911 of 2026 1 - Raut Rakhi Gopal W/o Rahul Pratik Karim Aged About 32 Years R/o Street No. 08, Adarsh Nagar, Mowa, Raipur, Tehsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Department Of School Education, 1st Floor, 3rd Block, Indravati Bhavan, H O D Building, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Director Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director Educational Division Raipur, Pension Bada, School Education Board, 1st Floor Complex, Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Education Officer District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Purnendra Khichariya on behalf of Mr. Virendra Verma, Advocate For State For Respondent No. 3 : : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. G.A. Dr. Saurabh Pande, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2026.09.29 16:15:52 +0530 2 Order on Board 29/09/2026 1. This application has been preferred to restore WPS No. 925 of 2022, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 31.08.2026. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that due to inadvertence, no one appeared on the date of hearing, when the matter was taken up for hearing and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. He would further submit that the applicant is interested in pursuing this matter and has a good case on merits. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents would oppose the submission made by learned counsel for applicant. 4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the applicant, the instant MCC is allowed and WPS No. 925 of 2022 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) payable to the High Court Bar Library Fund. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Jyoti