W.P(MD)No.8235 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI W.P(MD)No.8235 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD)No.6729 of 2026 PL.Nachiappan ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Commissioner of Land Administration, II-Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. 2.The District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Iluppur, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Keeranoor, Pudukkottai District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8235 of 2026 5.The Inspector of Police, Mathur Police Station, Mathur, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to approve the existing prescribed easementary right of way and access to the petitioner's property in Survey No.131 to the Trichy- Pudukkottai National Highways adjoining the 5th respondent police station, through the cart track in Survey No.136/1, Mathur Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Muruganandam For Respondents : Mr.S.Venkatesh (R1 to R4) Counsel for State : Mr.I.Murugesan (R5) Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by P.B.BALAJI, J.) This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the official respondents to approve the existing prescribed easementary right of way and access to the petitioner’s property in Survey No. 131. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8235 of 2026 2.The petitioner relied upon the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, which itself indicate that there is an alternative pathway available. As seen from the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is clear that the petitioner assumes that he has a prescriptive easementary right. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is unable to show that such easementary right has been declared by any competent Civil Court. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus. It is open to the petitioner to work out his remedies, if any, before the competent Civil Court, subject to the law of limitation. 4.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [N.S.K.,J.] [P.B.B.,J.] 18.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8235 of 2026 ps To 1.The Commissioner of Land Administration, II-Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. 2.The District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Iluppur, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Keeranoor, Pudukkottai District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Mathur Police Station, Mathur, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8235 of 2026 N.SATHISH KUMAR , J. and P.B.BALAJI , J. ps W.P(MD)No.8235 of 2026 DATED : 18.06.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis