Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3782 (PAT)

Md. Imran @ Md. Imran Shaikh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./27110/2026 · 2026-04-28

Chandra Shekhar Jha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27110 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-812 Year-2018 Thana- DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Md. Imran @ Md. Imran Shaikh S/o Kalim @ Md. Kalim R/o Vill- Bachharpur, PS- Pupri, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Shamima Khatoon W/o Md. Imran, D/o Md. Shaukat R/o vill - Bhalpatti, P.S.- Kamtaul, Dist.- Darbhanga ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Baidyanath Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 28-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner is named in the complaint petition and apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 812 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 326, 379, 307, 498-A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the DP Act. 3. As per complaint, it is alleged that the petitioner along with his family members committed mental and physical cruelty upon complainant when her parents refused to pay Rs. 1 lakh as to start business. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27110 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/3 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that complaint in issue is not supported by affidavit and, therefore, the allegation cannot be accepted true on its face, in view of legal report as available through Priyanka Srivastava and Another Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others as reported in [(2015) 6 SCC 287]. It is pointed that specific date of occurrence is also missing in support of allegation, makes it vague and unrealistic. 5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail. 6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as complaint in issue is not supported by affidavit prima-facie questioning the doubt qua allegation, accordingly petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JMFC, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27110 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 3/3 Darbhanga/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No. 812 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482(2) of BNSS. S.Tripathi/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T