Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37817 (KAR)

SMT. M SOUMYA v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/36959/2025 · 2026-08-27

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010797522025 NC: 2026:KHC:46319 WP No. 36959 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 36959 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. M SOUMYA D/O. MANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, TADAGA COLONY, SHIVANI RAILWAY STATION, SHIVANI HOBLI, TARIKERE TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT -577549 PRESENTLY WORKING AS OFFICE ATTENDANT GRADE-2 TOWN SUB-DIVISION-1, SHIVAMOGGA-577201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRUTHVI WODEYAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR MANGALORE ELECTRICTY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD (MESCOM) GOVT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING CORPORATE OFFICE, PARADIGM PLAZA, A. B SHETTY CIRCLE, B. MANGALORE-575001 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER (A AND HRD), MANGALORE ELECTRICTY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010797522025 NC: 2026:KHC:46319 WP No. 36959 of 2025 (MESCOM), CORPORATE OFFICE, PARADIGM PLAZA, A. B. SHETTY CIRCLE, MANGALORE-575001 3. THE ASST. GENERAL MANAGER, (ESTABLSIHMENT), CORPORATE OFFICE, PARADIGM PLAZA, A.B. SHETTY CIRCLE, MANGALORE-575001 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (V), O AND M SECTION,(MESCOM), KEB CIRCLE, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, SHIVAMOGGA-577201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MUHAMMAD SHAMIL., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO RECONSIDER THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER TO THE POST OF JUNIOR ASSISTANT BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DTD 12.06.25 VIDE ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation seeking consideration of the appointment to the post of Junior Assistant. The petitioner had submitted a representation to the respondent in this regard - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010797522025 NC: 2026:KHC:46319 WP No. 36959 of 2025 vide Annexure - C. However, despite the said representation, the respondents have neither considered the same nor passed any order thereon. Hence, this with petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that if reasonable time is granted, the respondents will consider Annexure - C and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. 3. In view of the submission made by the respondents and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the representation vide Annexure C and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. The said exercise shall be accomplished within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16