1 CGHC010379592026 2026:CGHC:42588 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9194 of 2026 1 - Prashant Sagar S/o Birju Sagar Aged About 18 Years R/o Balmiki Ambedkar Awas Police Station Kabir Nagar Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer Police Station Amanaka District Raipur Chhattistgarh. --- Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 29/09/2026 1. This the second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.65/2026 registered at Police Station Aamanaka, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence under Sections 296, 109 & 3 (5) of the BNS and under Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act. 2. First Bail Application was dismissed on merits vide order dated 22.07.2026 in MCRC No. 6322 of 2026. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the complainant/injured lodged a report with the concerned Police Station stating that on the date of the incident i.e. 21.2.2026, he was returning along with his wife to his house Kota. At about 5.30 pm when he reached near Trimurty Chowk, Heerapur Road, the accused persons started raising dispute with the 2 complainant/injured on account of previous enmity. Thereafter the accused persons assaulted the injured on his right thigh as well as medial aspect of back and the injuries are grievous in nature. Thereafter the FIR was registered against the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the injured has already been examined and has not supported the case of the prosecution. The charge- sheet has been filed and the applicant is in jail since 21.02.2026. The applicant is ready to abide by all stringent terms and conditions that may be imposed by this Court, and there is no likelihood of his absconding or tampering with the evidence. Thus, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail on the ground of parity. 5. On the other hand, learned State Counsel would oppose the bail application and submit that the first bail application of the applicant was dismissed on merits vide order dated 22.07.2026. He further submits that the wife of the injured (PW-1), namely Mahi Verma, has supported the case of the prosecution and has categorically stated that her husband was assaulted by the present applicant by means of a knife on the date of the incident. He would submit that, according to the medical report, the injury sustained by the injured was grievous in nature; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the first bail application was dismissed on merits, the wife of the injured has supported the case of the prosecution, and the injury sustained by the injured was grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Thus, the present bail application is rejected at the admission stage itself. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Jyoti