Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37807 (PNJ)

PARAMJIT KAUR AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CRWP/10686/2026 · 2026-09-03

To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-10686-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CRWP-10686-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Paramjit Kaur and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEERJA K. KALSON Present:- Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Yatin Bunger Asst. A.G. Punjab. ***** NEERJA K. KALSON J.(Oral) 1. The present criminal writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of the private respondents and further directing the respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 26.08.2026 (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already submitted representation on 26.08.2026 (Annexure P-1) to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Tarn Taran, raising the grievances raised in the present petition, but no action has been taken thereon so far. He further submits that, at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in a time-bound manner and to take action in accordance with law. SHWETA 2026.09.03 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10686-2026 2 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Yatin Bunger Asst. A.G. Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3-State and submits that the needful shall be done in accordance with law. Let a complete set of the paper-book be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District TarnTaran, Punjab, is directed to look into the representation dated 26.08.2026 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 6. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (NEERJA K. KALSON) 03.09.2026 JUDGE shweta Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SHWETA 2026.09.03 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document